Information on the activities of the Canadian Section of the International Association for the Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy

Call For Papers: The Canadian Section of the IVR (CS-IVR) will meet as an affiliate of the CPA At the University of Calgary, Alberta, Saturday May 28, 2016

The CS-IVR accepts papers devoted to subjects in law and legal theory and moral and political theory. Submitted papers (and commentaries on them) are circulated (password protected) via the IVR website (http://phil.uregina.ca/cs-ivr) and the authors and commentators briefly summarize their points to open discussions at the meeting. See http://phil.uregina.ca/cs-ivr/about.html for further information about CS:IVR meetings.

There is no specific theme for this year’s meeting; so your work in any of the above areas will be considered appropriate. However, we would welcome papers on the themes related to current affairs such as climate change, human rights, international law, global security, privacy, and aboriginal justice. Papers on the theme of the 2017 International IVR World meeting in Istanbul [moved to Lisbon] – peace – would of course be welcome as well.

Deadlines for the Calgary Meeting:

Due by

Friday, February 26, 2016: commitment to send a principal paper or commentary. To help with organizing, please send nbrett@dal.ca a note indicating that you intend to present a principal paper or commentary. Brief abstracts of principal papers should also be sent. A reminder will be sent in early February.

Friday, April 29: All principal papers should be submitted for circulation

Friday, May 20: All commentaries should be submitted for circulation

Meeting on Saturday, May 28

Principal papers (up to 10,000 words) and commentaries (up to 1200 words) should be sent to the CS-IVR webmaster David Elliot (elliotda@uregina.ca), with a copy to nbrett@dal.ca.

Nathan Brett, Executive Director

Please forward this call for papers to others who may be interested. If you wish to post this call for papers please print the attached copy.

Schedule for May 28

Schedule and Map [PDF]. Please see PDF schedule for meeting times, room locations, and other important details.

Papers Received: List of Abstracts pdf.gif

Mike Ashfield, On the Epistemic Status of Reasonable Disagreement: Reply to Enoch”
PDF: pdf.gif WORD: word.gif

Conor Barry, “Peace, Order and Good Government: John Stuart Mill and Canadian Confederation”
PDF: pdf.gif WORD: word.gif

Wesley Cragg, “Reshaping the Social Contract: The financial crisis as sign and symptom”
PDF: pdf.gif WORD: word.gif

Susan Dieleman, “Realism, Pragmatism, and Critical Social Epistemology”
PDF: pdf.gif WORD: word.gif

Susan Dimock, “Homelessness and Hate Crimes”
PDF: pdf.gif WORD: word.gif

Marzieh Eskandari, “Reasoning from a Tradition–Constituted Ground: MacIntyre’s Criticisms of Liberalism
PDF: pdf.gif WORD: word.gif

Kyle Johannsen, “A Legitimate Basis for Democratic Legitimacy”
PDF: pdf.gif WORD: word.gif

Andrew Molas, “Defending the CRPD: Dignity, Flourishing, and the Universal Right to Mental Health”
PDF: pdf.gif WORD: word.gif

Robert Murray, “The Disembodied-self and the Navigation Problem”
PDF: pdf.gif WORD: word.gif

Ken Nickel, “Death-Defying Decisions: First Nations Rights and Reasonable Limits”
PDF: pdf.gif WORD: word.gif

Charles-Maxime Panaccio, “L’approche analytique comme approche méthodologique au droit”
PDF: pdf.gif WORD: word.gif

Marc Ramsay, “Freedom of Expression and the Speech/Act Distinction”
PDF: pdf.gif WORD: word.gif

Roger Shiner, “When the Government Makes Corporations Speak”
PDF: pdf.gif WORD: word.gif

Alex Wellington, “Obedience to Law and Justification of Punishment: What Crito Should Have Said”
PDF: pdf.gif WORD: word.gif

Commentaries

Mike Ashfield, Comments on Wesley Cragg’s “Reshaping the Social Contract: The financial crisis as sign and symptom”
PDF: pdf.gif

Susan Dieleman, Commentary on Andrew Molas “Defending the CRPD: Dignity, Flourishing, and the Universal Right to Mental Health”
PDF: pdf.gif WORD: word.gif

Kyle Johannsen, Commentary on “On the Epistemic Status of Reasonable Disagreement: Reply to Enoch”
PDF: pdf.gif WORD: word.gif

Charles-Maxime Panaccio, Commenton M. Ramsey’s Freedom of Expression and the Speech/Act Distinction and R. Shiner’s When the Government Makes Corporations Speak
PDF: pdf.gif WORD: word.gif

Ken Nickel, Commentary on: ‘Defending the CRPD: Dignity, Flourishing, and the Universal Right to Mental Health’
PDF: pdf.gif WORD: word.gif

Marc Ramsay, Commentary on Roger A Shiner’s “When Government Makes Corporations Speak”
PDF: pdf.gif WORD: word.gif

Roger Shiner, “Comment on Marc Ramsey Speech / Act Distinction”
PDF: pdf.gif WORD: word.gif

Manuela L. Ungureanu, Commentary on Roger Shiner’s “When the Government Makes Corporations Speak”
PDF: pdf.gif WORD: word.gif